|
Blade PCs: early days yet
Akhtar Pasha explores the prospects of large businesses
deploying blade PCs to control TCO
As
enterprise IT managers look to provide more secure, cost-effective desktop replacement
solutions for their users, many are considering new alternatives to traditional
PC-server architectures. One of the more promising options is that of blade
PCs.
Emerging products like the HP and ClearCube blade PCs, Softricity SoftGrid,
and VMware Workstation and ACE offer new models for virtualizing the desktop.
[Refer to the box: Blade PC architecture].
Blade PCs are PCs that are housed in a blade chassis, residing in a rack and
cabinet on the data center floor. A typical 42-unit rack can support up to 112-240
blades per rack (depending upon the manufacturer). Users then remotely connect
their input-output devices to these blade PCs. Each blade has the complete complement
of software required by the user including OS, applications and data. No local
data is present; rather, everything is remotely delivered to the user via a
communication protocol such as Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) or Independent
Computing Architecture (ICA) or HP Remote Graphics Protocol (RGS).
Can blade PCs succeed where thin clients failed
|
"Desktop
virtualization using the thin client model such as blade PCs helps administrators
control the cost of managing desktops, upgrades, virus control and in
provisioning new users. Large customers can save on power and cooling
costs"
- Shrimathi Ambastha
Director - Technology, VMware India and SAARC
|
|
"While
acquisition costs for PCs continue to decline, support costs and TCO continue
to escalate. Additionally frequent OS upgrades and patch management and
anti-malware updates in conjunction with growing security risks and increasingly
complex software environments are making it harder to keep PCs safe and
up-to-date"
- Rajat Mehta
Country Category ManagerRemote Client Solutions, PSG, HP India
|
As of now HP is the only vendor selling blade PCs for virtualizing
desktops in India. Although this technology is yet to make its presence felt,
we found some early movers such as Tata Consulting Engineers that wanted to
move to a centralized computing architecture which would give it control over
the management of desktops and flexibility in architecture to move resources
[processor, memory], redundancy and a chance to control power and cooling costs
to help in going green. It has virtualized its desktops using HP blade PCs.
An industry standard 42U rack can house 280 such PCs. TCE has been able to optimize
availability and reduce desktop power consumption by a significant percentage
with blade PCs that consume just 25 watts of power.
T John Group of Institutions (TJSBI) is yet another example. It faced the stiff
challenge of mounting costs of having to replace and upgrade outdated hardware
every four years. Underutilization of over 50% of the desktops and downtime
resulting from virus attacks only added to its problems. It has deployed HP
Blade PCs bc2500 and replaced the old PCs with vc4725 and t5630 thin clients
for increased energy efficiency and data management. These thin clients improved
the organizations energy efficiency as they use almost 67% less energy
when compared to traditional desktops. This was realized not only in energy
costs but reduced air-conditioning costs and also the thin clients generate
less noise. Other benefits include centralized data, application management
and lower downtime.
A brokerage firm trading on the BSE and NSE has also bought
HP blade PCs to virtualize its physical desktop infrastructure. The brokerage
firm wanted a secure platform for trading and demanded a C/Port that connects
to a blade PC using standard homerun cable up to 200 meters long, in addition
to the standard I/Port which lets users connect to their Blade PCs over a standard
Ethernet network that may include routers, switches and media converters. The
C/Port is used for ultra-secure environments with direct connectivity to Blade
PCs over a point-to-point cable connection.
HPs other customers for Blade PCs include a defense establishment and
a few BPOs.
Although there is no data available on the growth of blade PCs used for desktop
virtualization, IDC has said that given the benefits offered by thin clients
and blade PCs, the market opportunity for these devices is robust. IDC expects
blade PC shipments to increase by nearly 150% on a worldwide basis by end 2010
and it expects worldwide shipments of just over 2 million units in 2010.
Deloitte has predicted that thin clients would be taken far more seriously in
2010 than they have been in previous years, even if they do not outsell conventional
PCs and laptops. Rajarshi Sengupta, Senior Director, Deloitte & Touche Consulting,
said, Over the next five years, thin clients [including blade PCs] should
reach 10% of an organizations computers, with the majority of medium to
large businesses considering a shift to virtual desktop infrastructure. We feel
that blade PCs can help deliver direct savings by minimizing and making IT support
and maintenance more efficient, as well as reducing hardware costs and licensing
fees. He added that there were other less tangible benefits to virtual
desktop infrastructure including mobility, increased productivity, lower real
estate costs, lower power consumption and better security. Those charged with
deploying thin clients may need to convince workers who begrudge the lack of
a local hard disk drive that the pure form of thin client entails. However,
abetted by a slow recovery, employers may consider it a good opportunity to
reshape working conditions.
| A Blade PC has three principal components in its
architecture. The first is a collection of input/output devices. These include
a standard video device such as monitor, audio setup, keyboard and mouse.
The second important component is the User Port. There are two types of
User ports that connect the server with the user namely the C/Port and I/Port.
The C/Port connects to the blade PC using standard homerun cable of up to
200 meters length. The C/Port option is ideal for ultra-secure environments
with direct connectivity to PC Blades over a point-to-point cable connection.
This option offers better performance but is more expensive than the I/Port.
When direct connections are not available, the I/Port lets users connect
to their PC Blades over a standard Ethernet network that may include routers,
switches and media converters. By connecting over Ethernet, the distance
between a PC Blade and the desktop can be unlimited provided that sufficient
network bandwidth is available. The I/Port can also be used in configurations
where up to four users connect to a single PC Blade lowering the cost for
entry-level applications.
The third component in the overall Blade architecture
is the blade PC itself. The blades are connected to the end user using
a User Port. If any blade PC fails, it can failover to another blade PC
without the end-user being aware; therefore businesses experience zero
downtime.
You would need three key pieces of software that
are required to create a virtual blade PC environment. Firstly, a virtualization
layer to host VMs such as VMware ESX, Microsoft Hyper V or Citrix XenDesktop.
The second piece would be the desktop OS. Thirdly, there is the connection
protocol to join the remote client and virtual desktops for which users
can choose from Microsoft Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Citrix Independent
Computing Architecture (ICA) or HP Remote Graphics Software (RGS).
A blade chassis in a rack (also known as a cage) in the
central room powers the blade PCs. The user interfaces with the unit located
several hundred feet away using a standard monitor, keyboard and mouse.
The input/output devices are connected using a very long cable to the
server. In this manner, the user can interact with server as if the desktop
was placed right under the work tabletop.
|
The yes-no dilemma
Enterprise requirements for PCs and notebooks have grown significantly. Rajat
Mehta, Country Category ManagerRemote Client Solutions, PSG, HP India,
said, In a distributed network, buying new PCs or upgrading PCs could
be a risky proposition and a nightmarish experience in terms of managing the
same. Additionally there is no easy way to roll out new branches (sizing hardware
configuration and managing it) to quickly ramp up operations for large businesses.
There are other factors that are challenging the traditional distributed computing
architecture such as poor utilization of machines. For example, demand
for hardware resources fluctuate within large businesses and there could be
instances where hardware resources are left lying idle while power users are
stuck with underpowered PCs. Setting up a common framework for security policies
and patch management for individual machines are tasks that are complex to execute.
Additionally IT managers in large businesses continue to face ongoing challenges
when it comes to securing their enterprise, lowering operational expenses, and
minimizing risk. Mehta said, The risks and costs associated with PC support
are one of the biggest problems. While acquisition costs for PCs continue to
decline, support costs and TCO continue to escalate. Additionally frequent OS
upgrades and patch management and anti-malware updates in conjunction with growing
security risks and increasingly complex software environments are making it
harder to keep PCs safe and up-to-date. He continued that best practices
for maintaining PCs were becoming so difficult that few organizations had the
ability to sustain them, leading to the potential for open security holes that
could end up costing organizations dearly.
Mehta said, In addition to cost and security issues, many IT managers
are on the lookout for computing architectures that offer the flexibility to
dynamically adapt to changing demands in terms of performance, scalability,
and robustness. This desire for agility is considered critical by IT managers
because they are now tasked with not only maintaining their IT infrastructure
but also providing value to the business. Having an architecture that helps
allocate computing resources as needed helps. For example, large businesses
can segment regular task users performing simple repetitive tasks whose computing
needs are relatively low. Then there are knowledge workers who have the broadest,
most variable requirementsin the hour-to-hour utilization of resources
it may vary from 10% to 80% in short durations based on the workplace productivity
task at hand. The third category is power users, the most demanding user group,
these individuals demand very high-performance computing devices and use a wide
variety of high-performance applications. Blade PCs, which provide all the capabilities
of a traditional PC but are housed in a data center are an important part of
a potential grid computing solution for clients when put together with software
that can dynamically allocate computing resources as needed.
According to Sengupta, thin clients existed 15 years back and have passed through
the hype cycle and are ready for commercial deployment. From a business
standpoint, we see a tremendous opportunity for [Blade PCs today] especially
in the KPO vertical. Large investment firms are offshoring their credit and
risk analysis to KPOs in India. These KPOs are legally not supposed [as per
contract] to store and keep any data pertaining to customers credit and
risk analysis on local drives. Blade PCs are the perfect solution as they give
KPO managers the ability to centrally manage virtual desktops without the fear
of security breaches, said Sengupta. Applying virus signatures and patches
management become so much easier with blade PCs.
Shrimathi Ambastha (Seema), DirectorTechnology, VMware India and SAARC,
said, Desktop virtualization using the thin client model such as Blade
PCs helps administrators control the cost of managing desktops, upgrades, virus
control and in provisioning new users. Large customers can save power and cooling
costs. While there are VMware customers using desktop virtualization solutions,
most of its deployments are on blade servers and not blade PCs.
Unlike other technologies, Blade PCs do not need upgrade/refresh in hardware
spending for 10-15 years and the technology reduces your power and cooling window
drastically. Mehta said, Power supplied to PCs is generally 110 watts
and would required additional resources such as power and air conditioning.
Whereas with a blade PC enclosure, the power consumed would be one-fourth (25
watts).
Sengupta added, A blade PC brings about significant savings in OPEX with
regard to power and cooling.
| In the recent past, new technologies and methods
have appeared to support centralized client computing, where users access
applications that run from a server. These include hosted virtual desktops
(HVDs), blade-based PCs, Web-based applications and software streaming.
Architecturally, all of the three are different from each other.
The blade-based PC is a hosted 'thick' client computing
environment running on dedicated hardware in a blade chassis form factor
in the data center where a dedicated blade is assigned to each user. The
strength of the PC architecture is such that dedicated computing resources
are available to the end user. The operating system (OS) and applications
are limited only by the speed of the processor, the amount of memory and
storage, the performance of the network and the intrinsic limitations
of the graphics subsystem.
This configuration is similar to that of HVD, with one
exception. Unlike HVD, where hardware resources are shared among several
individuals through the process of server virtualization, blade-based
PCs are mostly dedicated resources, so that each individual has his or
her own blade configuration. Dedicated hardware for users is a requirement,
because of the type of work or application load that is placed on the
blade; a shared-blade configuration yields an environment that challenges
the necessary performance that is needed.
For many high-performance workers, maximum performance
is a requirement and using a shared computing architecture such as HVD
and server-based computing (SBC) is not a viable option. HVD and SBC are
best-suited where applications have little impact on the processing required
for many concurrent users. Demanding applications in a shared environment
are typically too much for servers in a shared environment. As a result,
the most common alternative options for these workers have been PC workstations
that offer the maximum in system performance.
|
Pilots in the pipeline, cost remains a challenge
HP said that it had at least 60-80 blade PC pilots in the ITES and BFSI verticals.
Mehta said, Generally for any central thin-client deployments, most businesses
start small in pilots and once the benefits are proven to the management, the
project is ready for rollout. Blade PCs are expected to follow the same path.
Leo Joseph, Vice PresidentSystems x, STG, IBM India/SA, said, While
the concept of virtual client solutions has been around for quite some time
[mostly thin clients], the emergence of blade PCs for desktop virtualization
is quite new and unproven though it is common sense that it will bring about
high availability and savings in the form of power and cooling costs. However,
we do not see a big trend because of high deployment costs despite desktops
being a commodity now. Security and computing come at prohibitive costs and
this will limit the growth of blade PCs.
Ashok Tripathy, General Manager & Head, Systems & Technology Division,
Infrastructure Availability Services, Wipro Infotech, added, Despite being
involved in the one of biggest computerization contracts from the Employee State
Insurance Corporation (ESIC) for deploying 31,000 NComputing virtual desktops,
the traction for blade PCs for desktop virtualization is limited. Customers
want to know what they can get from blade PCs before they try it out. Nevertheless
customers are showing interest in thin clients, VDI and blade PCs.
HP is not deterred. To increase the affordability of blade PCs for desktop virtualization
it has introduced various finance options in an OPEX model through HP Financing.
Mehta explained, We are giving financial assistance to industries that
want to deploy blade PCs. Under this scheme, large businesses can run their
infrastructure for three to five years (and return the infrastructure to us
if they are unhappy with the service) with no capital investment on a pay-per-seat
model. In a single 2U rack, you can pack as many as 240 PCs. The thin clients
at the front-end can connect to any blade PC dynamically. This gives you huge
savings in terms of power and concurrent licensing. As far as the user is concerned,
its a 100% PC like experience for him, said Mehta.
As it turned out, the market for blade PCs for desktop virtualization remains
quite small and nascent because of the lack of support from hardware OEMs. Secondly,
the solution would appeal to a small section of the market namely KPOs and IT
houses because of the huge CAPEX requirement. Thirdly, a software-based desktop
virtualization option such as VDI is preferred over blade PCs because of the
cost advantages.
akhtar.pasha@expressindia.com
|