|
Humour
Digital action heroics
T A Balasubramanian on removing the last barricade
of human discriminationour ability to tell whether the person on the screen
is real or simulated
Heres the quiz, guys. Do you see the wrinkled face of the villain,
Dr. Nonothat shiny bald head with a few curls on both sides, and with
all those forked veins, crows-feet, and moles? says Georgio Lucasi,
CEO of Digital Reality Amplified to Mimic Anything, an emerging entertainment
software company that is referred to by the envious snobs in the business as
plain DRAMA. He stands next to a DVD system, while the scene plays on.
And can you see those tiny dimples and windblown hair of the lovely Momo?
Now wait and watch for the hero, Gogo. You can see the frown on Gogos
brow, and now you can see that he is angry and frustrated. See his perspiration
as it dribbles in complex ways, tracking every fold of flesh on his face.
Lucasi is talking animatedly to the DRAMA market development and promotion gang
under his charge. This includes Bimal Rao, Chief Marketing Manager and Sellina
Reddy, Regional Sales Manager, and their assorted team members.
Dr. Nono certainly must be Anoop Kher, while Gogoof course, he is
our dynamic hero, Akshun Kumar, says Rao brightly.
And Momo, of course is Katrina Kapoor, says Reddy, smugly. I
can recognize her eyes anywhere.
You are both right, and youre both wrong, says Lucasi, beaming
triumphantly.
What? say the two simultaneously, with open mouths.
Thats the beauty of our technologythe people you see on the
screen do, of course, look exactly like Anoop, Akshun and Katrinathey
are designed to be so. But they are not the real actors playing Nono, Gogo and
Momo. In this little clip from the movie, Follywood Mashup these
characters do look, move, and speak like human beings, but they are computer-generated
animations, as artificial as Donald Duck or Shrek.
Thats amazing, Boss, says Sellina, looking glazed. Rao, however,
is speechless.
Ah,
so they are amazing creations, sighs Lucasi, looking pleased. One
last barricade of human discriminationour ability to tell whether the
person on the screen is real or simulatedis about to crumble, and we,
at DRAMA, will be responsible for this magical subterfuge. When this film opens
next year, it will signal a change not only in cinema but also in television,
computer monitors, handheld displays, and the other ubiquitous screens of modern
life. Already thousands of people worldwide are exchanging talking-head emails,
getting news from synthetic broadcasters, even holding eye-to-eye conversations
with face-based databases. From now on, expect technology to literally have
a human face.
Boss, how did all this happen? says Rao, finding his voice.
Well, Bimal, you might modestly say that we digital demons are behind
this. With films like Follywood Mashup, you can expect to see legions of computer-generated,
photo-real human actors or follystars in special-effects parlance.
In a way, they have been creeping towards us from under the arc lights of animation
movies for more than a decade. From those terrifying dinosaurs in Jurassic Park
to the tragic vertically falling passengers on the sinking Titanic, computer-graphic
creations have been steadily evolving from the eerie to the heart-breakingly
intimate.
Thats interesting, Boss. But why has it taken so long?
A close-up, photo-real human being is surprisingly complicated to create
with just pixelsit is the most difficult thing to render because it is
the most familiar sight for us finicky humans. The tiniest flaw, and youthe
critical viewerwill instinctively realize that it is not right.
But we have a lot of great hardware and software to correct all that,
dont we? says Reddy.
We have the technology, yes, but not the techniques, as yet. As always,
Sellina, the devil is in the detailsor so my software artists tell me.
The human facelike mine and yours, for exampleis full of what they
call micro-movements. I am told that the little twitches of the bottom eyelid,
or even the skin folds alone are incredibly complex. Even the big guys at Pixar
have not been able to capture that yet. Imagine looking at the evil animated
incarnation of Anthony Hopkins playing Hannibal Lecter in close-up and not finding
those almost-invisible micro-twitches.
Of course, Boss, says Sellina, shuddering. Hed suddenly
stop being menacingand I would feel the difference at once.
So what do we do next? says Rao, ever the practical man of action.
Ah, but we are not quite there yet, either, says Lucasi, spreading
his hands wide. While Dr. Nono and his gang are amazingly realistic, they
are just a little short of being photo-real. If you watch this preview closely
again, you will see skin that is a shade too opaque and faces that are slightly
too stiffwhich is unacceptable for DRAMA productions. Even so, they are
so close to perfectshall we say 95%?they prove that the next jump
is achievable. The acid test will be when we are ready with a computer-animated
Katrina and the real Katrina on-screen at the same timeand it would be
impossible to tell who is who.
I couldnt tell the difference even with this 95% impersonator, Boss,
says Sellina, looking crestfallen.
Never mind, we are all bound to fall for it, says Lucasi, laughing.
In the meantime, we launch the revolutionary FaceChatter.
Thats better, Boss. What can we do with FaceChatter? says
Rao, eagerly.
Its a signal to our customers. A path-breaking DRAMA software package
that lets you send and receive talking-head emails. You will be able to have
a digital representation of your own face scanned from a photograph, and it
will speak using a recording of your own voice.
Oh, no, Boss. I could never use it, says Reddy.
And why not? says Lucasi, looking flabbergasted.
Imagine the lines under my eyes not twitching. It would look terrible.
And just not me!
|