|
A tale of four browsers
Tn
recent weeks, a lot has been happening on the Web application and Web-based
application front. In Browser nagri, Firefox 3 (FF3) finally made its debut
after three betas and release candidates. Was it worth the wait? I give the
browser two thumbs up.
Bookmarkings a breeze
Perhaps the nicest thing about FF3 is that it makes bookmarking a breeze and,
whats more important, lets you search your bookmarks and all the links
that youve visited in the last three months by typing keywords in the
browser address bar. Bookmarking just requires you to click the Star in the
address bar, its as simple as starring a message in Gmail.
Bookmark management is better in FF3 as well. You can search bookmarks from
the sidebar, which is nice. Whats nicer is that Undo finally works in
the bookmark sidebar. In previous versions deleting a bookmark meant that it
was gone with the wind. Now you can click CTRL+Z and resurrect accidently deleted
bookmarks.
Backing up bookmarks is easier than ever. FF3 automatically backs up your bookmarks
every day and you can restore them from the Organize Bookmarks dialog or if
you want to keep a copy of your bookmarks in a separate location then you can
manually backup your bookmarks with a couple of clicks and FF3 creates a json
file that contains your bookmarks. You can copy this file to a backup device
and restore your bookmarks from it in case your PC melts down.
Faster, less memory hungry
Performance improvements abound. Using AJAX-fuelled sites like Gmail has never
been faster. Things that used to have a perceptible lagrefreshing your
inbox, for instancehappen so quickly that blink and you'll miss it.
The browser is not a memory hog unlike FF2. Its memory usage is comparable to
Internet Explorer 7 which, considering that the latter is part of Windows and
tightly integrated into the OS, is not bad at all.
Tighter integration with the underlying OS
Browser integration with the OS has improved, at least on Windows. On both XP
and Vista, FF3 fits in better. The use of Vistas default font and subtle
improvements in the speed of menu display etc. all make for a smoother browsing
experience. The back button on the default themes bigger than the forward
button. As the back button is the one that gets the most clicks, this makes
sense.
Unfortunately, this does not seem to extend to third-party themes. I like to
use Qute, which has been a
popular theme from the FF1 days, and while there is a FF3 version, it does not
support this UI change, which is a pity. The browser shows you information about
ongoing downloads in the status bar telling you how many files are being downloaded
and how long its likely to take. This may not be a showstopper, but it
is very nice indeed.
That concludes my report on FF3. What of the other alternative browsers including
Apples massively hyped Safari and Opera?
I tried Safari 3.1 and was sorely disappointed. Font rendering on Safari sucks
rocks. This is probably because its based on the Konqueror engine (part
of KDE, a GUI environment thats very popular on Linux). Linux font rendering,
as I have written before, is god-awful and Safari brings this visual monstrosity
to Windows.
Opera is better than Safari, lots, heaps. I like the mobile version but have
never found the desktop edition
particularly compelling. Perhaps it is because that Opera tries so hard to be
cross-platform that it never fits well into Windows. Font rendering is again,
a bit off though not as badly as in Safari. Fonts look a little smaller and
slightly, very slightly, ragged. The browser is feature-loaded but unlike FF
or IE where the features are there when you need them but otherwise tucked away
neatly, in Opera the features are right up front and in your face.
What of Internet Explorer? The old reliable is looking a
little long in the tooth. Its been a long while since IE 7 came out which
itself came out long after IE 6. IE 8 is in beta and Microsoft only knows when
itll be out. Till then, FF3 is the king of the browser hill. Get it today!

prashant.rao@expressindia.com
|