|
Humour
Debugging Chaibo1
T A Balasubramanian continues his account
of the confrontation at Baffle Corp when corporate chai-serving robot Chaibo
is introduced.
Did you hear it? Of course you heard it, Papyrus. You were there in the
meeting, along with Brooke Bond. First, it was my voice being borrowed without
my permission. Then, this
monster called me a silly goat! says
Gulabi Manpowa, Head of Human Resources at Baffle Corporation.
This is an outrage, Papyrus. I am offended, and I demand an apology from
this walkie-talkie box. What does it think I am?
The monster that so upset Gulabi is Chaibo, the corporate chai-serving robot
that has been crafted to meet your requirements for improving the calibre of
meetings by Doodh Byramji of Baff-Tech. Doodh, of course, has built the offender
using the latest technology from Ironica Robotica, the robotics company. The
internal test of Chaibos interactive system within Baffle was supposed
to give Bond, and you, some clues as to what would have to be done to tune up
Chaibos finer sensibilities.
But the test has turned into a grand inquisition, no less.
While champions of robotics and artificial intelligence, such as the beautiful
Prof Ironica Asimova, Head of Ironica, the company named after her, may bristle
at the idea that there are deep problems of adjustment between ordinary people
and artificial creations that seem to get increasingly human, the area of business
etiquette is still a new frontier.
The situation becomes even more delicate when experienced
corporate warriors like Gulabi face off with greenhorn robots being tested in
the workplace. And you, Papyrus Bytewala, ever-bewildered CIO at Baffle, are
caught in the thick of the confrontation. Bond, being a junior under your care,
cannot take the rap for the offence, though you have already reprimanded him
privately for being careless enough to ruffle Gulabi, even if it was intended
as a prank.
To sort matters out, you have asked for technical support
from the source, and Doodh, with crafty foresight, has sent in the heavy artillery,
since he has decided not to be present when the flak flies. So the current Chaibo
Test Debugging Committee includes Gulabi, temporarily called the offendee,
you and Bond, making up the combined CIO faction of Baffle, Ironica herself,
and one member of her staff who turns out to be her primary backup support.
Oh, Papyrus, here is my Chief Designer, Lola Lipton, Head of the biodynotics
team that developed Chaibo. She will explain the features of Chaibo to you,
says the lovely Ironica, turning to introduce a stunning young girl in jeans
and a form-fitting T-shirt who walks into the conference room. Bond, who has
been silent so far, lets out a soft whistle.
There must be a bug in the program, dear, says
Ironica, her voice soothing as she turns to Gulabi. Please understand
that Chaibo is a little, shall we say, immature at the moment. We are always
being surprised by the way Chaibo reacts to different experiences, learns new
attributes and adapts to life in the corporate world.
Turning to Lola, she asks, What are the valid derogative
names you have packed into Chaibo, Lola?
Goat, pig, cow, rat, skunk and other such creatures, says Lola,
promptly, tossing her lustrous hair back, much to Bonds bemusement. Theyre
chosen to be mildly offensive, but not inflammatory, if I may add. We use derogative
nouns that are drawn from references to farm animals and wild creatures. Tests
have shown that they are far better than curses and expletives, which tend to
make offendees extremely belligerent. In some cases, robots have been smashed
when they uttered what we thought were simple curses to give expression to their
emotive states.
Farm animals seem fine to me. How does Chaibo know which insult to use,
and with what provocation? asks Bond, looking admiringly at Lola.
Depends on the severity of the provocation and the built-in PCO.
PCO being?
Political correctness optimiser. It is calibrated to pick just the right
derogative for each encounter with humanoids.
So that makes me an offensive humanoid? Am I supposed to be happy if your
metallic moron here calls me a goat? says Gulabi, bristling.
Hey, cool off, will you? snaps Lola. Chaibo
is an intelligent device, not a metallic moron. So what if he is mildly insulting?
Hello? Is anybody listening? wails Gulabi. This so-called
intelligent device calls me a goat and you think thats only mildly insulting,
huh?
The derogative he picked was not supposed to be passed by the PCO. The
PCO is usually very reliable, but since you insist, Ill have to recalibrate
the list, Ms Manpowa.
Ironica raises her slender hands in the air at this point. Please, Lola,
Gulabi, this is not a fault-finding and finger-pointing mission. Let me try
and explain PCO and Chaibos design to you Papyrus, and you too, Gulabi.
She takes a long, slow look around to catch everyones attention. You
see, Chaibo in performance mode can be controlled by remote, say, by Bond here,
who is his designated owner at Baffle, but the autonomous function is far more
exciting, since it incorporates emergent-behaviour artificial intelligence.
Chaibo reacts to stimuli and, in effect, learns, responding according to a programmed
personality that develops freely.
Although Chaibos AI is rudimentary, Ironica explains, the potential is
nearly limitless. It has a circumscribed ability to react with basic emotions
like delight, sadness, fear, and anger. He is programmed with attributeslikes
and dislikesand reacts based on them. Chaibo likes blue, for
instance, so he follows a blue dress, such as Bonds Levis, which he tracks
with a colour-sensing camera in his nose. You could say that Chaibos visual
PCO includes blue. When Bonds blue denim pants go out of range, Chaibo
continues to look for it but then, like a puppy, grows bored after a while.
As Chaibo gets older, he will have a longer attention span.
Well, all right, so hes learning the ropes, I see, says Gulabi,
grudgingly.
I should hope so, says Ironica, her eyes twinkling. Let me
tell you how you could become Chaibos friend. He will follow a person
who pets itreplicating attachment behaviourbecause he has been programmed
to respond to attention. What he will make of other experiences, however, is
somewhat unpredictable. So we will have to let him loose in Baffle and just
observe what happens.
That seems a little unpredictable for a corporate robot, isnt it?,
you say, wondering how this can be explained to your CFO.
You can just imagine Chaibo getting a tongue- lashing from Fin Fina for running
up a huge bill in damaged egos all over Baffle. Fina, of course, has lectured
you often on the valuation of intangibles. He would be happy to continue biting
your head off over intolerables.
|