|
From
being seen as the passion of a few technology cubs, chip design
in India has now moved into the big league, catching the attention
of biggies like TCS and Wipro. Srikanth R P looks at the latest
sunrise sector which has the potential to change India’s brand
image as a low-cost service provider
TIME
and again, analysts have questioned Indias supposed
strengths in software, saying that Indian players have
been concentrating on the low-end services segment. Even when
the boom and potential of the IT- enabled services space was
pointed out, the sceptics were unconvinced: this space too
could be replicated by countries like China or the Philippines.
But one segment which has both critics and industry organisations
impressed is chip design.
 |
| Ramesh
Emani says that Wipro’s competitive edge lies in its ability
to provide comprehensive hardware and software solutions |
In
recent years, several multinational companies have set up
base in India to exploit our vast reservoir of engineering
talent. A growing number of Indian firms from small start-ups
to TCS and Wipro have also entered this space. Further evidence
of Indias rising potential as a chip design player came
when the CEO of Texas Instruments, Tom Engibous, described
India as an emerging silicon design powerhouse.
An additional boost came when Intel CEO Craig Barrett said
that the worlds largest computer chip maker will invest
$130 million to expand its chip design centre in India in
a period of three to five years. Need more evidence? Vinod
Dham, known as the father of the Pentium chip, was in India
recently to scout for companies specialising in chip design.
In his current avatar as co-founder of NewPath Ventures, Dham
hopes to provide capitalthe critical element that many
Indian technology firms lackto make India a key player
in chip design. This optimism is endorsed by Nasscom, which
says that semiconductor design is at the same stage where
IT services was a decade ago.
Looking
back
Chip design is today a promising industry with hundreds of
Indian companies specialising in designing. But it is one
companys efforts that got India on the world map in
chip designing. Texas Instruments (TI) became the first semiconductor
major to establish an R&D centre in India in 1985. What
seemed like an ambitious decision then has turned out to be
a masterstroke. In addition to the huge cost advantage that
enabled TI to design its chips at a fraction of the normal
cost, the Indian arm has also contributed significantly to
the intellectual property of the global parent.
The faith shown by TI rubbed off on other giants. Soon MNCs
like Analog Devices and National Semiconductor entered to
take advantage of Indian skills in this field. Today, an illustrative
list of companies that have set up shop in India include Motorola,
IBM, Cisco, Ishoni Networks, Cypress Semiconductor and Sun.
Following suit are a host of Indian companies like Arasan
Chip, Bluefont Technologies, Cradle Technologies, Sasken,
Moschip and MindTree Consulting. Software service players
like Wipro, HCL Technologies and TCS have also jumped into
what is being touted as the next sunrise sector for Indian
IT companies.
The Taiwan factor
Producing semiconductors is a highly complex task that can
be broadly divided into three phases: design, fabrication
and assembly. The design phase involves detailing the physical
circuit that can implement a particular functionality on a
piece of silicon. Fabrication involves creating the physical
circuit on silicon, and is akin to manufacturing. Assembly
involves wrapping the microscopic silicon piece in a package
so that it can be used in an electronic circuit.
Traditionally, the chip design industry was the domain of
big players who did everything on their own, from chip design
to fabrication. The reasoning was simple. First, designing
a chip was a skills-intensive industry, and needed a large
team. Second, massive investments were needed to create the
infrastructure to fabricate the chip, which is why many firms
could not activate plans even if they had the expertise to
design a chip.
Then a couple of Taiwanese companies came along and challenged
this structure and turned it on its head. Taiwan Semic-onductor
created standalone fou-ndries that allowed chip design companies
to outsource their fabrication functions. This separated the
capital-intensive fabrication phase from the people-intensive
design phase. Small companies which had the talent but not
the required capital found this fabless model
attractive; it allowed countries like India to get into chip
design. Today the industry is highly fragmented, and has hundreds
of players concentrating on different aspects of the value
chain.
Industry structure
In India, the semiconductor manufacturing industry has a negligible
presence, while the design part of the industry has got several
players. The key players in the semiconductor design industry
can be segregated into fabless firms, design service firms,
silicon intellectual property firms and EDA (Electronic Design
Automation) tool vendors. Indian players have a presence in
all segments of the design part of the value chain, but if
you look at the overall Indian chip design industry, a majority
of them fall in the design services segment.
Design services
The reasons why a majority of Indian companies follow the
design services model are not hard to fathom. This business
model is tried and tested, and similar to the one followed
by IT services firms. Also, the break-even for such companies
is much easier to achieve compared to other sectors in the
design value chain since the only investment companies have
to make is in tools. Compared to players who specialise in
developing IP and then sell it to different customers, design
service firms have almost no risk involved as they have to
only execute specific contracts for big companies. Currently,
this space is the most active one, with players from start-ups
to titans like Wipro and HCL.
 |
| G
Venkatesh feels that the highest potential for growth
in the chip design services space is in outsourced R&D |
Evolution
It is interesting to trace the evolution of Indian chip design
firms. Entrepreneurs who earlier worked with large companies
realised the opportunity when they saw their firms subcontract
design projects to other companies. The promoters were also
ideally placed to leverage their relationships with their
previous employers. What followed next finds many parallels
between the strategies followed by Indian IT services firms
a decade ago.
In the initial stages, chip design companies tried to win
as many design assignments as possible in order to bring in
cash to survive and sustain operations; these projects also
gave the teams the much-needed design experience. Most of
these projects were extremely small, and were usually decided
on the basis of cost. During this evolution, the focus of
these firms was clear: gaining experience over making money.
In most of these projects it was seen that the company was
willing to lower its price as long as it managed to recover
incurred costs. These firms bade for time and knew that as
the team gained experience they could play a hand in bigger
projectswhich is what happened. Also, as companies started
gaining expertise in specific domains, they found that clients
were willing to pay a premium for specialised services. Accordingly,
this stage of evolution saw companies being segregated into
specific domains like wireless communication or mixed signal
design.
As MNCs started realising the benefits of outsourcing work
to Indian chip design companies, they also saw the need to
have dedicated design centres within the premises of these
companies; while the Indian companies would get assured business,
the MNCs would get the benefit of assured dedicated capacity
at a lower cost. In terms of experience too, Indian firms
gain a lot as they get exposed to high-end technologies. The
Indian chip design industry is presently bubbling with action
and trying to make the transition from piecemeal services
to full end-to-end solutions.
Silicon Intellectual Property firms
Silicon Intellectual Property (SIP) firms are also called
chipless firms since they do not create chips but create intellectual
property, i.e. designs that can be used by fabless firms or
integrated players to create chips. Most large semiconductor
companies have SIP and retain it inhouse, but SIP firms create
the IP and try to sell it or licence it to other players.
This model involves a higher gestation period, and there is
no guarantee of any return on investment. To follow the SIP
model successfully, a firm needs deep technological expertise
along with the required capital. Currently, only a few Indian
firms like Sasken and Arasan are present in this domain.
Similar to the products industry, this model can result in
significant gains in the long term by way of revenues from
licensing and royalty. Unlike the design services industry,
this domain requires firms with deep pockets in order to survive
the initial years. Some Indian design service companies have
spotted the potential in this field and have started offering
IP components along with their other services and products.
In many cases, the experience and effort involved in a project
is spun off into an IP. While IP may not contribute significantly
in the short term, it offers other advantages. Indian chip
design firms now know that the same IP block can be used for
a different design after some tweaking. This helps in ramping
up a project in quick time. The other advantage is that clients
prefer design service companies that offer IPs in addition
to their regular bouquet of services. This is because clients
are more sure of companies that have showcased their design
capability expertise by way of IP developed.
There are significant differences between an IP block, an
IP component and an IP core. An IP block is simply a design
that has been developed by a firm and can be re-used and customised.
An IP component can be compared to a product where a company
buys the component and integrates it into its own design.
An IP core is a critical part of the entire design and requires
considerable expertise. A client typically pays players in
this space not only a licensing fee but also a share of revenues
earned on the design.
 |
| The
products developed by TI India are used by TI Inc. to
manufacture semiconductor solutions for TI’s customers
worldwide, says Biswadip Mitra |
Indian
players
Sasken has successfully weathered many challenges to create
a brand image for itself in this field. Today, the company
ranks among the worlds best when it comes to offering
end-to-end chip design services like architecture design,
front-end design, back-end design and analogue and mixed signal
design in the telecom domain. Though this domain witnessed
a slowdown last year, Sasken is still bullish on its long-term
prospects. Says G Venkatesh, who heads the semiconductors
business division at Sasken, We see the decline positively,
since more and more companies will look at outsourcing to
India to reduce their costs. The highest potential for growth
is in outsourced R&D. For example, as R&D budgets
in the telecom sector start coming under the axe, the ability
to achieve more for less R&D spends by outsourcing to
India becomes an attractive proposition. Unlike the
software services space where a similar scenario is unfolding,
there are not many Indian firms which have the capability
that a Sasken has.
Another successful player is Wipro. The company provides a
range of services in this spacefrom turnkey ASIC (Application
Specific Integrated Circuit) design and design re-engineering
to design verification and block development. The main advantage
for Wipro over its competitors lies in its expertise in software,
in addition to its hardware domain knowledge. Says Ramesh
Emani, chief executive, embedded and access solutions, Wipro,
The software content in hardware is on the rise; it
is estimated to climb from 20 percent to 55 percent as we
move to submicron and multimillion gate count chips. Hence
we believe our competitive edge over others lies in our ability
to provide comprehensive hardware and software solutions.
In most cases, Wipros clients have a total chip development
roadmap as per which they prefer to develop commercial silicon
chips based on the design from Wipro; clients who are developing
prototypes find it desirable to partner with a single company
which takes total responsibility from development to siliconisation.
This is where the ability of Wipro to provide a one-stop solution
to different clients needs scores over competitors.
(Wipro has already completed more than 50 system-on-chip designs
for its customers.)
Since most companies involved in this space are start-upsunlike
the software services spacemost of them are concentrating
on different target segments to build domain expertise. Take
for instance a company called E-infochips, which specialises
in developing verification services. Says Pratul Shroff, president
and CEO of the company, We are currently focused on
front-end design and verification services, and provide a
variety of verification components. Since last year, over
50 percent of our resources have been engaged in developing
verification IP.
The reason why Shroff is concentrating on this domain: One
of the main challenges for chip design companies is to not
only develop new designs but also validate them. Since validation
efforts are almost three times the design effort, much time
is lost in bringing the product to market. Verification components
like the ones developed by E-infochips can considerably reduce
the time-to-market. The company has already launched four
verification components in the international market in the
areas of optical networking, high speed IO interfaces and
storage
networking.
Another big name in the Indian chip design industry is Moschip,
which follows a fabless model. Moschip designs chips inhouse
and outsources the fabrication part to foundries in South
Asian countries. As a result, the cost of producing a chip
with Indian design expertise is only one-fourth of what other
global competitors spend.
Opportunity for Indian firms
Nasscom believes that SIP and design services are two segments
that Indian players must tap actively. To know why the importance
of SIP is growing one has to just look at the growing complexity
in designing a chip. Today, designing a chip with several
million gates without reusing IP blocks is impractical. Current
designer productivity ranges from 200 to 250 gates per designer
per day. Current ASICs used in networking equipment have between
1-5 million gates, and research agencies predict this can
reach 100 million gates in the next few years. If you take
current designer productivity, a project may well run over
a thousand man-years. The duration of the same project could
be cut down significantly if a company uses a SIP block. While
this block may take more time to design initially, in future
projects it saves considerable time. It is estimated that
over 65 percent of ASICs now use reusable SIP blocks in their
design.
Another reason for the increasing usage of SIP has been the
increasing demand for closing the design gap, which refers
to the gap between the potential available for design and
the actual capacity available for design. Example: advances
in semiconductor technology have made it possible to pack
an increasing number of transistors on a single IC. However,
as designer productivity has not increased at the same pace,
newer ICs take a larger amount of design effort. This not
only increases design timelines but also design costs. The
need is to therefore increase design capacity by utilising
the number of transistors available for design and reduce
time-to-market. The only viable solution is to reuse design
with SIP reusable blocks. As design complexity grows, so will
the need for reusable designs, which is why Indian firms with
the required expertise can make a mark in this space. Compared
to design services, players in this space can command fatter
margins.
Right now, as per market reports, Indian companies are present
in a small way in only one segment of the SIP market: bus
interface blocks like PCI and USB. Nasscom believes that the
SIP segment can be a big growth area for Indian companies
as they can provide value-added services through the addition
of related software; this can include protocol stacks, device
drivers and real-time operating systems (RTOS). While there
is much potential in this space, there is a still a long way
to go for Indian companies since Japan, US and Europe dominate
this sector in a big way. If Indian companies have to grow,
they will have to aggressively address segments such as the
microprocessor, DSP and memory SIP markets.
Texas Instruments
After being operational in India for about 17 years now, TI
India has grown to 900 members, but more importantly, it has
made a series of excellent innovations. The company has developed
Ankoor, the first DSP to be designed from scratch in India;
Mantra, the worlds fastest control DSP; Malhar, the
worlds fastest floating point DSP; and TLV1562, the
worlds first programmable resolution analog-to-digital
converter. The Indian arm has filed more than 175 patents
this year. Further, products from TI India have won several
awards, including two successive EDN design awards in 1999
and 2000.
Says Biswadip Mitra, managing director, TI India, We
are currently involved in the design and development of high-end
digital signal processors, analog ICs, systems software and
applications software in the areas of wireless, cable broadband,
WLAN and digital still-cameras. The products developed by
TI India are used by TI Inc. to manufacture semiconductor
solutions for TIs customers worldwide.
EDA tool vendors
As the Indian chip design industry started growing, firms
that sold tools used in chip design also jumped into the fray.
Today, Bangalore is host to Cadence and Synopses, two of the
biggest electronic design automation (EDA) firms. As chip
design is a fast-changing technology, Indian firms have to
continuously upgrade their design skills to stay in the race.
For instance, most chips now use 0.13 micron (which permits
up to 10 million gates per chip) as opposed to the earlier
0.18 micron technology (which permits 2-5 million gates per
chip). With EDA tools, companies can automate the entire complex
process of designing a chip.
Says Himanshu Singh, acting country manager, Cadence Design
Systems India, We have grown tremendously in India,
reflecting the growth of the chip industry over here. In the
past two years our customer base has grown from 25 to over
80; this includes both start-ups and large companies.
Cadences client roster reflects the whos who of
the Indian chip industry: Analog Devices, Broadcom, Cypress
Semiconductors, HCL, Mind-Tree, Motorola, Philips Software
Centre (India), Sasken, ST Microelectronics, TI India, ECAD
Technologies, Tejas Networks and Wipro. Looking at the Indian
potential, Cadence has already made investments of close to
$100 million; its R&D unit is also the largest Cadence
facility outside the US.
Challenges
While there are significant growth opportunities for Indias
chip design industry, the same can be squandered if we do
not pay heed to some basic problems. For instance, Indian
engineering colleges currently train only about 250-300 very
large system system integration (VLSI) engineers every year,
while the actual requirement is much higher. Moreover, the
lack of awareness of chip design opportunities makes potential
chip design candidates go into software programming. Also,
as most design tools are expensive, most start-ups cannot
afford to buy all they need. To address this issue, some vendors
like Cadence have started offering flexible engagement models
for start-ups. Additionally, the lack of strong linkages between
design firms in India and their foundries puts Indian companies
at a disadvantage as compared to Taiwanese and Korean companies.
Another disadvantage is the lack of analogue and mixed signal
domain expertise, which will become even more relevant as
semiconductor process technology shrinks. The need is therefore
to not only build an infrastructure which will support this
industry, but also to help it move up the value chain to offer
high-end design services.
Still,
there have been positive signs like the continued interest
which MNCs have shown in establishing VLSI design development
centres in India. The increase in the number of MNCs making
inroads in India has also helped in building a favourable
business ecosystem, which in turn will help in the growth
of the industry. If Indian companies design their strategies
the same way they design their chips, they can aspire to reach
revenues of over $800 million within the next few yearsonly
from semiconductor design.
| Cradle
Technologies |
|
If
there is one Indian company which can truly establish
Indias image as a potent player in the chip design
space, it has to be Cradle Technologies. At present,
chips are released in the market and then applications
are built around them. But Cradles unique architecture
allows complicated applications to be first built in
the software and then integrated onto a single chip.
This is different from the procedure commonly adopted
where chip designing is done with expensive custom-made
chips or expensive combinations of conventional processors.
Says Satish Gupta, co-founder and CEO, Cradle, The
key challenge for chip designers today is that the work
takes a long time and a lot of capital, which is why
many companies shy away from designing. Our architecture,
the Universal Microsystem Architecture (UMS) is different;
instead of using different chips for each function,
you can use software to write everything on one chip.
Our chips will be also be generic in the sense that
while the chip will contain some basic functions, by
using software one can add different functions. The
customer can thus customise the chip according to his
needs.
Small chip design companies can buy Cradles fabless
chips (which dont have any applications on them)
and program them according to the needs of the specific
industry. Equipment manufacturers can also benefit to
a great extent. All they need to do is purchase UMS
chips and load the functions they want on the chipvery
much the way PC vendors buy microprocessors and load
software combinations.
For example, all the functionalities of a DVD player
like imaging, multimedia, digital video and communication
can be built into a single chip. Another example is
secure routers. Currently, customers who want secure
routing have to purchase a router and a separate VPN
gateway, resulting in high cost of ownership and difficulty
in load balancing between the two boxes.
The two functions performed by the two boxes, i.e. IP
routing and classification, and security processing,
can now be integrated onto one chip resulting in a 3:1
bill of materials cost advantage and a dramatic increase
in security processing. For equipment manufacturers,
developing on UMS represents a significant saving in
cost, plus an opportunity to combine many functions
and redefine products in the market. However, a lot
of marketing has to be carried out by Cradle as most
firms find it difficult to believe what Cradle has done.
|
|